CISA KEV workbench

01

CVE-2026-106931CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

EG Secure Solutions SiteGuard Server Edition OS Command Injection Vulnerability

EG Secure Solutions SiteGuard Server Edition contains an OS command injection vulnerability which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands with root or SYSTEM privileges on the system running the affected product.

EG Secure SolutionsSiteGuard Server Edition

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-20
Due: 2026-10-23
Priority interval: 63.4–76.0
Coverage: 85%

↗

02

CVE-2026-96656CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Plex Media Server External Control of File Name or Path Vulnerability

Plex Media Server contains an external control of file name or path vulnerability which can allow an admin user to write arbitrary files that may be executed on load. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-96652, CVE-2026-96654, and CVE-2026-96655.

PlexMedia Server

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-20
Due: 2026-10-23
Priority interval: 63.3–67.5
Coverage: 85%

↗

03

CVE-2026-110936CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Siemens Software Center Uncontrolled Search Path Element Vulnerability

Siemens Software Center contains an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability that could allow an authenticated local attacker to place a specially crafted DLL in a directory that the application searches, leading to arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the affected application.

SiemensSoftware Center

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-20
Due: 2026-11-03
Priority interval: 62.0–66.2
Coverage: 85%

↗

04

CVE-2026-96654CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Plex Media Server Improper Neutralization of Encoded URI Schemes in a Web Page Vulnerability

Plex Media Server contains an improper neutralization of encoded URI schemes in a web page vulnerability that could allow an attacker to call other plugins' functions and supply their own parameters. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-96652, CVE-2026-96655, and CVE-2026-96656.

PlexMedia Server

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-20
Due: 2026-10-23
Priority interval: 58.6–62.8
Coverage: 85%

↗

05

CVE-2026-96652CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Plex Media Server Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability

Plex Media Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability which could allow an attacker using any X-Plex-Token value to include a full URL in the 'protocol' parameter and force the Plex server to POST to the attacker's chosen destination. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-96654, CVE-2026-96655, and CVE-2026-96656.

PlexMedia Server

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-20
Due: 2026-11-03
Priority interval: 54.6–58.8
Coverage: 85%

↗

06

CVE-2026-96655CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Plex Media Server Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability

Plex Media Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow an authenticated user to request arbitrary internal or external addresses via the '/video/:/transcode/universal' path parameter. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-96652, CVE-2026-96654, and CVE-2026-96656.

PlexMedia Server

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-20
Due: 2026-11-03
Priority interval: 54.6–58.8
Coverage: 85%

↗

07

CVE-2026-102764CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

BeyondTrust Remote Support Authentication Bypass by Spoofing Vulnerability

BeyondTrust Remote Support contains an authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability that could allow a remote attacker to perform file operations on the appliance.

BeyondTrustRemote Support

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-16
Due: 2026-10-19
Priority interval: 65.4–69.6
Coverage: 85%

↗

08

CVE-2025-61624CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Fortinet Multiple Products Path Traversal Vulnerability

FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager contain a path traversal vulnerability that may allow an authenticated attacker with admin profile and at least read-write permissions to write or delete arbitrary files via specific CLI commands.

FortinetMultiple Products

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-16
Due: 2026-10-19
Priority interval: 57.1–68.4
Coverage: 85%

↗

09

CVE-2026-21589CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Atlassian Multiple Products Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties Vulnerability

Multiple Atlassian products (Bitbucket Data Center ,Confluence Data Center, Jira Service Management Data Center, Jira Software Data Center, Bamboo Data Center, Crowd Data Center, Crucible and Fisheye) contain a files or directories accessible to external parties vulnerability which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to access specific files within the web application root directory in affected versions.

AtlassianMultiple Products

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-15
Due: 2026-10-18
Priority interval: 70.4–82.8
Coverage: 85%

↗

10

CVE-2026-105134CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Ahsay AhsayCBS Command Injection Vulnerability

Ahsay AhsayCBS contains a command injection vulnerability that could allow a remote attacker to execute operating system commands via manipulation of the random parameter in the Replication Receiver component’s /rps/api/json/UpdateReceivers.do endpoint. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-105133.

AhsayAhsayCBS

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-14
Due: 2026-10-17
Priority interval: 77.4–81.6
Coverage: 85%

↗

11

CVE-2026-0322CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS Code Injection Vulnerability

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS contains a code injection vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with network access to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the firewall.

Palo Alto NetworksPAN-OS

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-14
Due: 2026-10-17
Priority interval: 63.5–78.7
Coverage: 85%

↗

12

CVE-2026-76519CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Cisco Secure Email Gateway Relative Path Traversal Vulnerability

Cisco Secure Email Gateway contains a relative path traversal vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to write arbitrary files on the underlying operating system.

CiscoSecure Email Gateway

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-14
Due: 2026-10-17
Priority interval: 67.0–72.3
Coverage: 85%

↗

13

CVE-2026-105133CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Ahsay AhsayCBS Improper Authentication Vulnerability

Ahsay AhsayCBS contains an improper authentication vulnerability that could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication via manipulation of the random parameter in the API component’s checkSysPwd function. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-105134.

AhsayAhsayCBS

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-14
Due: 2026-10-17
Priority interval: 63.1–67.2
Coverage: 85%

↗

14

CVE-2026-104935CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Ivanti Connect Secure Authentication Bypass by Spoofing Vulnerability

Ivanti Connect Secure contains an authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability that allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands.

IvantiConnect Secure

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-13
Due: 2026-10-16
Priority interval: 71.7–80.1
Coverage: 85%

↗

15

CVE-2026-96951CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Microsoft Windows Command Injection Vulnerability

Microsoft Windows Shell contains a command injection vulnerability that allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

MicrosoftWindows

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-13
Due: 2026-10-16
Priority interval: 64.5–77.8
Coverage: 85%

↗

16

CVE-2015-5477CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

ISC BIND Data Processing Errors Vulnerability

ISC BIND contains a data processing errors vulnerability that could allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service via TKEY queries.

ISCBIND

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-08
Due: 2026-10-11
Priority interval: 79.4–94.4
Coverage: 85%

↗

17

CVE-2015-3306CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

ProFTPD Improper Access Control Vulnerability

ProFTPD contains an improper access control vulnerability that could allow remote attackers to read and write to arbitrary files via the site cpfr and site cpto commands.

ProFTPDProFTPD

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-08
Due: 2026-10-11
Priority interval: 84.9–94.4
Coverage: 85%

↗

18

CVE-2016-3081CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Apache Struts Command Injection Vulnerability

Apache Struts contains a command injection vulnerability that could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via method:prefix when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled.

ApacheStruts

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-08
Due: 2026-10-11
Priority interval: 79.9–94.0
Coverage: 85%

↗

19

CVE-2021-3199CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

ONLYOFFICE Docs Server Path Traversal Vulnerability

ONLYOFFICE Docs contains a path traversal vulnerability that can occur when JWT is used, via a /.. sequence in an image upload parameter and could allow for remote code execution.

ONLYOFFICEDocs

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-08
Due: 2026-10-11
Priority interval: 73.5–77.7
Coverage: 85%

↗

20

CVE-2023-22894CISA KEVAssessments differAssessments differSource-reported scope

Strapi Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information Vulnerability

Strapi contains a cleartext storage of sensitive information vulnerability that could allow attackers with access to the admin panel to discover sensitive user details via the query filter. The impacted product(s) could be end-of-life (EoL) and/or end-of-service (EoS). Users are advised to discontinue use and/or transition to a supported version. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2023-22621 to achieve remote code execution.

StrapiStrapi

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Assessments differfactor_c_cvss

Eligible assertions materially conflict and remain visible side by side.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve conflict

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-08
Due: 2026-10-11
Priority interval: 56.0–66.0
Coverage: 73%

↗

21

CVE-2026-88779CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Citrix NetScaler Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer Vulnerability

Citrix NetScaler ADC (formerly Citrix ADC) and Citrix NetScaler Gateway (formerly Citrix Gateway) contain an improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer vulnerability that could allow for a denial of service.

CitrixNetScaler

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-04
Due: 2026-10-07
Priority interval: 63.3–72.1
Coverage: 85%

↗

22

CVE-2026-102489CISA KEVAssessments differAssessments differSource-reported scope

Zammad GmbH Zammad Session Fixation Vulnerability

Zammad GmbH Zammad contains a session fixation vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution as the zammad user. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-102490.

Zammad GmbHZammad

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Assessments differfactor_c_cvss

Eligible assertions materially conflict and remain visible side by side.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve conflict

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-02
Due: 2026-10-05
Priority interval: 64.0–69.9
Coverage: 73%

↗

23

CVE-2026-102490CISA KEVAssessments differAssessments differSource-reported scope

Zammad GmbH Zammad Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability

Zammad GmbH Zammad contains an improper privilege management vulnerability that can allow the local zammad user to escalate privileges to root. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-102489.

Zammad GmbHZammad

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Assessments differfactor_c_cvss

Eligible assertions materially conflict and remain visible side by side.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve conflict

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-02
Due: 2026-10-05
Priority interval: 62.7–69.2
Coverage: 73%

↗

24

CVE-2026-104286CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Fortinet FortiMail Path Traversal Vulnerability

Fortinet FortiMail contains a path traversal and an improper neutralization of NULL byte or NULL character vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to write arbitrary files on the underlying system via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.

FortinetFortiMail

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-10-01
Due: 2026-10-04
Priority interval: 67.5–73.6
Coverage: 85%

↗

25

CVE-2026-76504CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Hex Encoding Vulnerability

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager contains a hex encoding vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access an affected system with privileges of the admin user due to improper handling of URI encoding in an HTTP request.

CiscoCatalyst SD-WAN Manager

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-30
Due: 2026-10-03
Priority interval: 67.2–75.1
Coverage: 85%

↗

26

CVE-2026-86950CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Apple Multiple Products Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

Apple iOS, macOS, and iPadOS contain an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in CoreGraphics that may lead to arbitrary code execution.

AppleMultiple Products

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-29
Due: 2026-10-13
Priority interval: 64.2–71.6
Coverage: 85%

↗

27

CVE-2026-88772CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Citrix NetScaler Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer Vulnerability

Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway contain an improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer vulnerability that could allow for remote code execution or denial of service

CitrixNetScaler

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-27
Due: 2026-09-30
Priority interval: 66.0–74.8
Coverage: 85%

↗

28

CVE-2026-88771CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Citrix NetScaler Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway contain an improper input validation vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands.

CitrixNetScaler

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-27
Due: 2026-09-30
Priority interval: 65.8–74.6
Coverage: 85%

↗

29

CVE-2026-87902CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

WordPress Core Remote File Inclusion Vulnerability

WordPress Core contains a remote file inclusion vulnerability which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to make page-template resolution include a chosen readable local `.php` file outside the active theme directories, leading to remote code execution.

WordPressCore

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-25
Due: 2026-09-28
Priority interval: 72.9–85.0
Coverage: 85%

↗

30

CVE-2026-65660CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Microsoft SharePoint Code Injection Vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint contains a code injection vulnerability which could allow an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

MicrosoftSharePoint

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-25
Due: 2026-09-28
Priority interval: 64.9–72.3
Coverage: 85%

↗

31

CVE-2026-67279CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Mikrotik RouterOS Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow Vulnerability

Mikrotik RouterOS contains an improper enforcement of behavioral workflow vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated client to open a session channel and send an exec request. This vulnerability can be chained to achieve unauthenticated exploitation of CVE-2026-86060.

MikroTikRouterOS

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-25
Due: 2026-09-28
Priority interval: 59.3–65.4
Coverage: 85%

↗

32

CVE-2026-71362CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Adobe Commerce and Magento Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability

Adobe Commerce and Magento contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that could allow an attacker to leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive resources without any user interaction.

AdobeCommerce and Magento

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-24
Due: 2026-09-27
Priority interval: 81.5–96.5
Coverage: 85%

↗

33

CVE-2026-5430CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

WSO2 Multiple Products Path Traversal Vulnerability

WSO2 API Control Plane, API Manager, Traffic Manager & Universal Gateway contain a path traversal vulnerability that could allow for unrestricted file upload and lead to remote code execution.

WSO2Multiple Products

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-24
Due: 2026-09-27
Priority interval: 66.5–77.5
Coverage: 85%

↗

34

CVE-2026-93616CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Check Point Multiple Products Path Traversal Vulnerability

Check Point Security Management Server, Multi-Domain Security Management Server, Log Server, Multi-Domain Log Server, and SmartEvent contain a path traversal vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload and execute arbitrary scripts.

Check PointMultiple Products

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-22
Due: 2026-09-25
Priority interval: 81.9–96.9
Coverage: 85%

↗

35

CVE-2026-85102CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Check Point Multiple Products Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

Check Point Security Gateway and Check Point Spark Firewall using Site to Site VPN or Remote Access VPN contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability which could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the Gateway.

Check PointMultiple Products

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-22
Due: 2026-09-25
Priority interval: 79.2–94.2
Coverage: 85%

↗

36

CVE-2026-93952CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Arista VeloCloud Orchestrator Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

Arista VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) on-prem contains an improper input validation vulnerability that may allow a remote attacker to access privileged internal functionality and impact the VCO host. Successful exploitation may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the orchestrator and data managed by the orchestrator.

AristaVeloCloud Orchestrator

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-22
Due: 2026-09-25
Priority interval: 65.8–72.6
Coverage: 85%

↗

37

CVE-2026-94127CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

F5 BIG-IP APM Heap-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

F5 BIG-IP APM contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability when access policy and an OAuth profile are configured on a virtual server. This vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform remote code execution.

F5BIG-IP APM

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-22
Due: 2026-09-25
Priority interval: 66.2–72.4
Coverage: 85%

↗

38

CVE-2026-7273CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Zyxel GS1900 Series Switches Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Zyxel GS1900 series switches contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the CGI program which could allow a LAN-based, unauthenticated attacker to exploit the flaw and potentially execute OS commands via a crafted HTTP request.

ZyxelGS1900 Series Switches

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-21
Due: 2026-09-24
Priority interval: 65.2–76.8
Coverage: 85%

↗

39

CVE-2025-39682CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Linux Kernel Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions Vulnerability

Linux Kernel contains an improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions vulnerability in the TLS receive path which allows a zero-length record retrieved from the rx_list to bypass the intended recvmsg() record-type handling, potentially causing subsequent TLS records to be processed using incorrect zero-copy and queuing assumptions. The impacted product(s) could be end-of-life (EoL) and/or end-of-service (EoS). Users are advised to discontinue use and/or transition to a supported version.

LinuxKernel

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-18
Due: 2026-09-21
Priority interval: 67.9–77.4
Coverage: 85%

↗

40

CVE-2026-53266CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

Linux Kernel contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the ebtables SNAT target which allows an ARP sender hardware address rewrite to write directly into a nonlinear socket-buffer fragment backed by a splice-imported file page. The impacted product(s) could be end-of-life (EoL) and/or end-of-service (EoS). Users are advised to discontinue use and/or transition to a supported version.

LinuxKernel

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-18
Due: 2026-09-21
Priority interval: 63.8–74.8
Coverage: 85%

↗

41

CVE-2025-39964CISA KEVAssessments differAssessments differSource-reported scope

Linux Kernel Race Condition Vulnerability

Linux Kernel contains a race condition vulnerability which allows concurrent writes to the same AF_ALG socket causing data to be unpredictably interleaved and creating inconsistencies in the socket's internal state.

LinuxKernel

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Assessments differfactor_c_cvss

Eligible assertions materially conflict and remain visible side by side.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve conflict

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-18
Due: 2026-09-21
Priority interval: 56.1–74.0
Coverage: 73%

↗

42

CVE-2026-76460CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Cisco Identity Services Engine Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs Vulnerability

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) contain an incorrect use of privileged APIs vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to the affected device by bypassing the web-based management interface.

CiscoIdentity Services Engine

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-16
Due: 2026-09-19
Priority interval: 72.5–87.3
Coverage: 85%

↗

43

CVE-2026-87886CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Acronis Backup Incorrect Default Permissions Vulnerability

Acronis Backup plugin for cPanel & WHM and extension for Plesk contains an incorrect default permissions vulnerability that could allow for privilege escalation.

AcronisBackup

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-16
Due: 2026-09-19
Priority interval: 60.5–69.2
Coverage: 85%

↗

44

CVE-2026-58704CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Google Pixel Improper Authorization Vulnerability

Google Pixel devices contain an improper authorization vulnerability in the cellular modem. A logic error may allow an attacker to bypass permission checks and escalate privileges.

GooglePixel

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-16
Due: 2026-09-19
Priority interval: 63.5–67.7
Coverage: 85%

↗

45

CVE-2026-76461CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

Cisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection Vulnerability

Cisco AsyncOS software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway (SEG) contains a SQL injection vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

CiscoSecure Email Gateway

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-14
Due: 2026-09-17
Priority interval: 75.4–81.5
Coverage: 85%

↗

46

CVE-2026-85706CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

GitLab Community Edition and Enterprise Edition Path Traversal Vulnerability

GitLab Community Edition and Enterprise Edition contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated user to read arbitrary files due to an improper path confinement and missing authentication enforcement in the repository commits API.

GitLabCommunity Edition and Enterprise Edition

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-11
Due: 2026-09-14
Priority interval: 84.2–93.6
Coverage: 85%

↗

47

CVE-2026-42018CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

JFrog Artifactory Improper Authentication Vulnerability

JFrog Artifactory contains an improper authentication vulnerability that could return an internal anonymous-user token to an unauthenticated caller when anonymous access is disabled, potentially exposing sensitive resources.

JFrogArtifactory

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-11
Due: 2026-09-25
Priority interval: 65.0–72.4
Coverage: 85%

↗

48

CVE-2026-42016CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

JFrog Artifactory Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability

JFrog Artifactory contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that leads to a privilege escalation attack due to a validation check of the token signature/issuer and not the token’s scope.

JFrogArtifactory

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-11
Due: 2026-09-25
Priority interval: 66.1–72.1
Coverage: 85%

↗

49

CVE-2026-84869CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

ConnectWise ScreenConnect Improper Privilege Management and Missing Authorization Vulnerability

ConnectWise ScreenConnect contains both an improper privilege management and missing authorization vulnerability that may allow an attacker to transfer and execute files through an active remote session without authorization or host confirmation.

ConnectWiseScreenConnect

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-11
Due: 2026-09-14
Priority interval: 66.7–70.9
Coverage: 85%

↗

50

CVE-2026-86060CISA KEVSource-reported scopeEvidence supported

MikroTik RouterOS Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command Vulnerability

MikroTik RouterOS contains an improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command vulnerability which allows an attacker to change the trusted RouterOS policy mask, leading to privilege escalation.

MikroTikRouterOS

Required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Evidence reason details

Last verified source snapshot retainedfactor_a_kev

The admitted source contract constrains coverage for this claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Review source contract

Evidence supportedfactor_b_epss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: evidence-policy-v1.1.0
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Evidence supportedfactor_c_cvss

Eligible evidence is present for this bounded claim.

Revision: casca-direct-cvss-eligibility-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: None

Source-reported scopefactor_d_breadth

The source assertion is retained, but its canonical identity is unresolved.

Revision: casca-factor-d-obligations-v1
Cutoff: 2026-10-22T18:07:53.945Z
Resolution: Resolve identity

Added: 2026-09-10
Due: 2026-09-13
Priority interval: 68.1–74.2
Coverage: 85%

↗

Known exploited

EG Secure Solutions SiteGuard Server Edition OS Command Injection Vulnerability

Plex Media Server External Control of File Name or Path Vulnerability

Siemens Software Center Uncontrolled Search Path Element Vulnerability

Plex Media Server Improper Neutralization of Encoded URI Schemes in a Web Page Vulnerability

Plex Media Server Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability

Plex Media Server Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability

BeyondTrust Remote Support Authentication Bypass by Spoofing Vulnerability

Fortinet Multiple Products Path Traversal Vulnerability

Atlassian Multiple Products Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties Vulnerability

Ahsay AhsayCBS Command Injection Vulnerability

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS Code Injection Vulnerability

Cisco Secure Email Gateway Relative Path Traversal Vulnerability

Ahsay AhsayCBS Improper Authentication Vulnerability

Ivanti Connect Secure Authentication Bypass by Spoofing Vulnerability

Microsoft Windows Command Injection Vulnerability

ISC BIND Data Processing Errors Vulnerability

ProFTPD Improper Access Control Vulnerability

Apache Struts Command Injection Vulnerability

ONLYOFFICE Docs Server Path Traversal Vulnerability

Strapi Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information Vulnerability

Citrix NetScaler Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer Vulnerability

Zammad GmbH Zammad Session Fixation Vulnerability

Zammad GmbH Zammad Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability

Fortinet FortiMail Path Traversal Vulnerability

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Hex Encoding Vulnerability

Apple Multiple Products Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

Citrix NetScaler Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer Vulnerability

Citrix NetScaler Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

WordPress Core Remote File Inclusion Vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint Code Injection Vulnerability

Mikrotik RouterOS Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow Vulnerability

Adobe Commerce and Magento Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability

WSO2 Multiple Products Path Traversal Vulnerability

Check Point Multiple Products Path Traversal Vulnerability

Check Point Multiple Products Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

Arista VeloCloud Orchestrator Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

F5 BIG-IP APM Heap-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Zyxel GS1900 Series Switches Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Linux Kernel Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions Vulnerability

Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

Linux Kernel Race Condition Vulnerability

Cisco Identity Services Engine Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs Vulnerability

Acronis Backup Incorrect Default Permissions Vulnerability

Google Pixel Improper Authorization Vulnerability

Cisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection Vulnerability

GitLab Community Edition and Enterprise Edition Path Traversal Vulnerability

JFrog Artifactory Improper Authentication Vulnerability

JFrog Artifactory Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability

ConnectWise ScreenConnect Improper Privilege Management and Missing Authorization Vulnerability

MikroTik RouterOS Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command Vulnerability